PFUT vs VTI
Putnam Sustainable Future ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PFUT | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.64% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $4M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 72 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +1.20% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.40% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.99% | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.47% | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.0% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -44.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Putnam Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 25, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
PFUT vs VTI Performance
Putnam Sustainable Future ETF (PFUT) is a ETF from Putnam Investments and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PFUT returned +4.40% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, PFUT is up 1.20% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Over three years, PFUT compounded at +10.99% per year against +21.51% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +0.47% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs +0.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PFUT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.0% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.9% for PFUT and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PFUT charges 0.64% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $64 vs $3 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PFUT currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
PFUT and VTI share 52 holdings out of 2799 unique holdings combined, representing a 5.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PFUT or VTI?
PFUT has an expense ratio of 0.64% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $61 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PFUT or VTI?
Over the past year PFUT returned +4.40% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), PFUT annualized +0.61% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PFUT or VTI?
PFUT has been the more volatile fund at 20.0% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: PFUT -44.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both PFUT and VTI?
PFUT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between PFUT and VTI?
PFUT and VTI share 52 common holdings with a 5.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2799 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PFUT or VTI?
PFUT yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.