PGF vs VXUS
Invesco Financial Preferred ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PGF | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $664M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.42% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 102 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -2.61% | +15.44% | |
| 1Y Return | -1.16% | +26.36% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.86% | +20.98% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -1.16% | +9.68% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -79.2% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 1, 2006 | Jan 26, 2011 |
PGF vs VXUS Performance
Invesco Financial Preferred ETF (PGF) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PGF returned -1.16% while VXUS returned +26.36%. Year to date, PGF is down 2.61% versus a gain of 15.44% for VXUS.
Over three years, PGF compounded at +4.86% per year against +20.98% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are -1.16% and +9.68% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.90% annualized vs -1.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PGF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.7% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -79.2% for PGF and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PGF charges 0.55% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $5 annually, a gap of $50 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PGF currently yields 6.42% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
PGF and VXUS share 1 holdings out of 7961 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PGF | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HBAN | 0.64% | 0.05% | 0.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PGF or VXUS?
PGF has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $50 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PGF or VXUS?
Over the past year PGF returned -1.16% vs +26.36% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), PGF annualized -1.59% vs +4.90% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PGF or VXUS?
PGF has been the more volatile fund at 17.7% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: PGF -79.2% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both PGF and VXUS?
PGF and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PGF and VXUS?
PGF and VXUS share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7961 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PGF or VXUS?
PGF yields 6.42% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so PGF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.