PGRI vs SCHD
Putnam International Stock ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, PGRI or SCHD?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PGRI | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $7M | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.11% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 29 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +3.59% | +23.46%Best |
| 1Y Return | +4.25% | +27.20%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.41% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.16% |
| Top 10 Weight | 51.7% | 41.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Putnam Investments | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 21, 2025 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
PGRI vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
PGRI vs SCHD Performance
Putnam International Stock ETF (PGRI) is an ETF from Putnam Investments and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year PGRI returned +4.25% while SCHD returned +27.20%. Year to date, PGRI is up 3.59% versus a gain of 23.46% for SCHD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PGRI charges 0.55% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $6 annually, a gap of $49 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PGRI currently yields 0.11% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 27 holdings in PGRI and 100 in SCHD, totalling 99.9% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in PGRI and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 29 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 99 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for PGRI (99.9% of the fund), and 2 for PGRI that do not appear in SCHD (4.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PGRI and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PGRI or SCHD?
PGRI has an expense ratio of 0.55% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $49 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PGRI or SCHD?
Over the past year PGRI returned +4.25% vs +27.20% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, PGRI or SCHD?
PGRI yields 0.11% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than PGRI?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.