PGRI vs VYM
Putnam International Stock ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, PGRI or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PGRI | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $7M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.11% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 29 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +3.59% | +11.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | +4.25% | +15.34%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.22% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.30% |
| Top 10 Weight | 51.7% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Putnam Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 21, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
PGRI vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
PGRI vs VYM Performance
Putnam International Stock ETF (PGRI) is an ETF from Putnam Investments and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PGRI returned +4.25% while VYM returned +15.34%. Year to date, PGRI is up 3.59% versus a gain of 11.35% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PGRI charges 0.55% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $4 annually, a gap of $51 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PGRI currently yields 0.11% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 27 holdings in PGRI and 557 in VYM, totalling 99.9% and 99.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in PGRI and 557 in VYM, against full books of 29 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 528 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for PGRI (97.1% of the fund), and 2 for PGRI that do not appear in VYM (4.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PGRI and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PGRI or VYM?
PGRI has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $51 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PGRI or VYM?
Over the past year PGRI returned +4.25% vs +15.34% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, PGRI or VYM?
PGRI yields 0.11% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than PGRI?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.