IVV vs PGRI
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Putnam International Stock ETF
Which is better, IVV or PGRI?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | PGRI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.55% |
| AUM | $896.5B | $7M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.11% |
| Holdings | 508 | 58 |
| YTD Return | +10.99%Best | +2.29% |
| 1Y Return | +11.30%Best | +3.25% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.62% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.79% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.9%Best | 15.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -8.9%Best | -12.9% |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $11,287Best | $10,286 |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.9%Best | 48.9% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Putnam Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 21, 2025 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 23, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026 (1 years).
IVV vs PGRI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
IVV vs PGRI Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Putnam International Stock ETF (PGRI) is an ETF from Putnam Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +11.30% while PGRI returned +3.25%. Year to date, IVV is up 10.99% versus a gain of 2.29% for PGRI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PGRI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.5% compared with 12.9% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.9% for IVV and -12.9% for PGRI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while PGRI charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $55 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.11% for PGRI.
Holdings Overlap
0.1% of IVV's money is in holdings PGRI also owns. 2.7% of PGRI's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
PGRI and IVV share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 28 in PGRI, against full books of 508 and 58.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 2 positions for PGRI that do not appear in our book for IVV (3.7% of the fund), and 500 for IVV that do not appear in PGRI (99.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in PGRI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRH:IECrh Public Limited Plc | 0.08% | 2.70% | 2.62% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and PGRI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or PGRI?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PGRI charges 0.55%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $52 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or PGRI?
Over the past year IVV returned +11.30% vs +3.25% for PGRI, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +12.87% vs +2.86% for PGRI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or PGRI?
PGRI has been the more volatile fund at 15.5% annualized versus 12.9% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -8.9% vs PGRI -12.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and PGRI?
IVV and PGRI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and PGRI?
2.7% of PGRI's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 2.7% of PGRI's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 28 in PGRI.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PGRI?
IVV yields 1.10% while PGRI yields 0.11%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PGRI better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.