PIEL vs SCHD
Pacer International Export Leaders ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, PIEL or SCHD?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PIEL | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $1M | $112.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 3.13% |
| Holdings | 102 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +15.51% | +27.56%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +30.29% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.37% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.23% |
| Top 10 Weight | 45.0% | 41.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 22, 2025 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
PIEL vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
PIEL vs SCHD Performance
Pacer International Export Leaders ETF (PIEL) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Year to date, PIEL is up 15.51% versus a gain of 27.56% for SCHD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PIEL charges 0.49% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $6 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PIEL currently yields 0.00% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
11.3% of PIEL's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 21.6% of SCHD's money is in holdings PIEL also owns.
SCHD and PIEL share little of their money.
6 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in PIEL and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 102 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 92 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for PIEL (78.0% of the fund), and 93 for PIEL that do not appear in SCHD (88.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
21.6% of SCHD is already inside PIEL.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PIEL or SCHD?
PIEL has an expense ratio of 0.49% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $43 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between PIEL and SCHD?
21.6% of SCHD's money is in holdings PIEL also owns. 21.6% of SCHD's is in holdings PIEL also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in PIEL and 100 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, PIEL or SCHD?
PIEL yields 0.00% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than PIEL?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.