PIEL vs VOO

PIEL vs VOO

Which is better, PIEL or VOO?

VOO costs less.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.0%.

Lower Fees: VOOLess Concentrated: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPIELVOO
Expense Ratio0.49%0.03%Best
AUM$1M$997.4B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.08%
Holdings102509
YTD Return+14.33%Best+12.74%
1Y Return-+19.43%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.18%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.76%
Top 10 Weight45.0%36.4%Best
Fund FamilyPacer ETFsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionDec 22, 2025Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

PIEL vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

PIEL vs VOO Performance

Pacer International Export Leaders ETF (PIEL) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, PIEL is up 14.33% versus a gain of 12.74% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PIEL charges 0.49% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PIEL currently yields 0.00% against 1.08% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

PIEL already in VOO96.9%
VOO already in PIEL33.9%

96.9% of PIEL's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 33.9% of VOO's money is in holdings PIEL also owns.

Most of PIEL is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

70 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in PIEL and 504 in VOO, against full books of 102 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 424 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for PIEL (65.4% of the fund), and 29 for PIEL that do not appear in VOO (2.8%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in PIELWeight in VOODifference
AAPLApple Inc Ord5.29%6.59%1.30%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 376.28%4.30%1.98%
GOOGL Alphabet Inc. Class A5.23%3.25%1.98%
AVGOBroadcom Inc5.45%2.77%2.68%
METAMeta Platform Inc 5.16%1.92%3.24%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc5.05%1.47%3.58%
AMATApplied Materials, Inc.3.41%0.89%2.52%
LRCXLam Resh Corp3.13%0.84%2.29%
GEGeneral Electric Co.3.10%0.60%2.50%
KOCoca-cola Co.2.93%0.49%2.44%

96.9% of PIEL is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

PIELVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PIEL or VOO?

PIEL has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between PIEL and VOO?

96.9% of PIEL's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 33.9% of VOO's is in holdings PIEL also owns. They hold 70 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in PIEL and 504 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, PIEL or VOO?

PIEL yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than PIEL?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.