PIEL vs VYM

PIEL vs VYM

Which is better, PIEL or VYM?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.0%.

Lower Fees: VYMLess Concentrated: VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPIELVYM
Expense Ratio0.49%0.04%Best
AUM$1M$81.6B
Dividend Yield0.00%2.24%
Holdings102613
YTD Return+14.33%Tie+14.33%Tie
1Y Return-+20.01%
3Y Return (annualized)-+18.43%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.16%
Top 10 Weight45.0%25.9%Best
Fund FamilyPacer ETFsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Value
InceptionDec 22, 2025Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

PIEL vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

PIEL vs VYM Performance

Pacer International Export Leaders ETF (PIEL) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, PIEL is up 14.33% versus a gain of 14.33% for VYM.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PIEL charges 0.49% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $4 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PIEL currently yields 0.00% against 2.24% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

PIEL already in VYM32.2%
VYM already in PIEL21.0%

32.2% of PIEL's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 21.0% of VYM's money is in holdings PIEL also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

31 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in PIEL and 602 in VYM, against full books of 102 and 613.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 538 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for PIEL (76.2% of the fund), and 68 for PIEL that do not appear in VYM (67.4%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in PIELWeight in VYMDifference
AVGOBroadcom Inc5.45%7.29%1.84%
KOCoca-cola Co.2.93%1.31%1.62%
PGProcter & Gamble Company2.71%1.42%1.29%
PMPhilip Morris International Inc.2.29%1.17%1.12%
TXNTexas Instruments, Inc2.03%1.13%0.90%
IBMIntl Business Machines Corp1.74%1.10%0.64%
LINLinde Plc Ordinary Shares1.76%0.99%0.77%
MCDMcdonald'S Corp1.50%0.80%0.70%
ADIAnalog Devices, Inc.1.46%0.80%0.66%
QCOMQualcomm1.35%0.81%0.54%

32.2% of PIEL is already inside VYM.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

PIELVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PIEL or VYM?

PIEL has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $45 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between PIEL and VYM?

32.2% of PIEL's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 21.0% of VYM's is in holdings PIEL also owns. They hold 31 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in PIEL and 602 in VYM.

Which pays a higher dividend, PIEL or VYM?

PIEL yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than PIEL?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.