PJUL vs XYZY

PJUL vs XYZY

Which is better, PJUL or XYZY?

Each has led over a different period.

PJUL has a lower expense ratio. PJUL led over 3Y, XYZY over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: PJULHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPJULXYZY
Expense Ratio0.79%Best1.36%
AUM$1.3B$33M
Dividend Yield0.00%73.70%
Holdings1225
YTD Return+7.02%+20.50%Best
1Y Return+8.26%+19.61%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+13.17%Best+9.55%
5Y Return (annualized)+10.28%-
Volatility (annualized)6.3%Best40.7%
Max Drawdown-10.7%Best-52.3%
$10,000 over 3.1 years$14,610$14,937Best
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustYieldMax ETF
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleOption WritingOption Writing
InceptionAug 7, 2018Oct 10, 2023

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 11, 2023 to Nov 11, 2026 (3.1 years).

PJUL vs XYZY growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.

Compare PJUL against instead:PJUL vs SPYPJUL vs QQQPJUL vs VOOPJUL vs VTIXYZY against:XYZY vs VXUS

PJUL vs XYZY Performance

Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and YieldMax XYZ Option Income Strategy ETF (XYZY) is an ETF from YieldMax ETF. Over the past year PJUL returned +8.26% while XYZY returned +19.61%. Year to date, PJUL is up 7.02% versus a gain of 20.50% for XYZY.

Over three years, PJUL compounded at +13.17% per year against +9.55% for XYZY.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

XYZY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 40.7% compared with 6.3% for PJUL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.7% for PJUL and -52.3% for XYZY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PJUL charges 0.79% per year while XYZY charges 1.36%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $136 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PJUL currently yields 0.00% against 73.70% for XYZY.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of PJUL and XYZY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

PJULXYZY

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PJUL or XYZY?

PJUL has an expense ratio of 0.79% while XYZY charges 1.36%. PJUL is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, PJUL or XYZY?

Over the past year PJUL returned +8.26% vs +19.61% for XYZY, so XYZY leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, PJUL or XYZY?

XYZY has been the more volatile fund at 40.7% annualized versus 6.3% for PJUL. Worst drawdown: PJUL -10.7% vs XYZY -52.3%.

Should I hold both PJUL and XYZY?

PJUL and XYZY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, PJUL or XYZY?

PJUL yields 0.00% while XYZY yields 73.70%, so XYZY currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is XYZY better than PJUL?

PJUL has a lower expense ratio. PJUL led over 3Y, XYZY over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.