PLTW vs QQQ
Roundhill PLTR WeeklyPay ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PLTW | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $102M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 12.99% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -15.98% | +19.68% | |
| 1Y Return | -27.26% | +26.75% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 78.0% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -61.7% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 19, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
PLTW vs QQQ Performance
Roundhill PLTR WeeklyPay ETF (PLTW) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year PLTW returned -27.26% while QQQ returned +26.75%. Year to date, PLTW is down 15.98% versus a gain of 19.68% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PLTW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 78.0% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -61.7% for PLTW and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.22. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PLTW charges 0.99% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $18 annually, a gap of $81 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PLTW currently yields 12.99% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
PLTW and QQQ share 1 holdings out of 104 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PLTW | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PLTR | 19.87% | 1.32% | 18.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PLTW or QQQ?
PLTW has an expense ratio of 0.99% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $81 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PLTW or QQQ?
Over the past year PLTW returned -27.26% vs +26.75% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), PLTW annualized +35.25% vs +13.15% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PLTW or QQQ?
PLTW has been the more volatile fund at 78.0% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: PLTW -61.7% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both PLTW and QQQ?
PLTW and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.22, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PLTW and QQQ?
PLTW and QQQ share 1 common holdings with a 1.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 104 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PLTW or QQQ?
PLTW yields 12.99% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so PLTW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.