PLTW vs VYM
Roundhill PLTR WeeklyPay ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 613 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PLTW | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $144M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 138.79% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 613 | |
| YTD Return | -15.02% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | -9.83% | +21.08% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.16% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.00% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 78.7% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -61.7% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 19, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
PLTW vs VYM Performance
Roundhill PLTR WeeklyPay ETF (PLTW) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PLTW returned -9.83% while VYM returned +21.08%. Year to date, PLTW is down 15.02% versus a gain of 14.57% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PLTW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 78.7% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -61.7% for PLTW and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.36. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PLTW charges 0.99% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $4 annually, a gap of $95 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PLTW currently yields 138.79% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
PLTW and VYM share 0 holdings out of 605 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PLTW or VYM?
PLTW has an expense ratio of 0.99% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $95 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PLTW or VYM?
Over the past year PLTW returned -9.83% vs +21.08% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), PLTW annualized +34.93% vs +6.99% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PLTW or VYM?
PLTW has been the more volatile fund at 78.7% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: PLTW -61.7% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both PLTW and VYM?
PLTW and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of -0.36, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PLTW and VYM?
PLTW and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 605 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PLTW or VYM?
PLTW yields 138.79% while VYM yields 2.24%, so PLTW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.