PMTL vs VXUS
First Trust Indxx Quality Precious Metals Miners ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, PMTL or VXUS?
Precious Metals against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PMTL | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $3M | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.59% |
| Holdings | 75 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | +32.53%Best | +16.15% |
| 1Y Return | - | +27.58% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.48% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.09% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Commodity | Equity |
| Style | Precious Metals | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 22, 2026 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
PMTL vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
PMTL vs VXUS Performance
First Trust Indxx Quality Precious Metals Miners ETF (PMTL) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, PMTL is up 32.53% versus a gain of 16.15% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PMTL charges 0.65% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $5 annually, a gap of $60 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PMTL currently yields 0.00% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 71.0% of PMTL's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 87.5% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of PMTL is already inside VXUS. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
53 positions in common, counted across the 74 positions we hold weights for in PMTL and 8,092 in VXUS, against full books of 75 and 8,747.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PMTL | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AEM:CAAgnico Eagle Mines Ltd | 5.29% | 0.18% | 5.11% |
| B:CABarrick Mining Corp | 4.29% | 0.08% | 4.21% |
| WPM:CAWheaton Precious Metals Corp | 3.84% | 0.11% | 3.73% |
| FNV:CAFranco-Nevada Corp | 3.10% | 0.09% | 3.01% |
| KGC:CAKinross Gold Corp | 2.68% | 0.06% | 2.62% |
| GFI:ZAGold Fields Limited Sponsored Adr (1 Ads : 1 Ordinary) | 2.41% | 0.07% | 2.34% |
| FRES:LNFresnillo Plc | 2.33% | 0.01% | 2.32% |
| LUG:CALundin Gold, Inc. | 2.12% | 0.01% | 2.11% |
| AMSJ:ZAAnglo Platinum Ltd | 1.89% | 0.04% | 1.85% |
| DPM:CADpm Metals Inc | 1.83% | 0.02% | 1.81% |
71.0% of PMTL is already inside VXUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PMTL or VXUS?
PMTL has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $60 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between PMTL and VXUS?
At least 71.0% of PMTL's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 53 positions in common, counted across the 74 positions we hold weights for in PMTL and 8,092 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, PMTL or VXUS?
PMTL yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than PMTL?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.