PSCM vs VXUS
PSCM vs VXUS
Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. PSCM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PSCM | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $21M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.97% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 27 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +21.18% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +38.90% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.36% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.96% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -52.5% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 7, 2010 | Jan 26, 2011 |
PSCM vs VXUS Performance
Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF (PSCM) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PSCM returned +38.90% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, PSCM is up 21.18% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, PSCM compounded at +15.36% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +10.96% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, PSCM has the edge at +9.20% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PSCM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.4% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -52.5% for PSCM and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PSCM charges 0.29% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $5 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSCM currently yields 0.97% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
PSCM and VXUS share 2 holdings out of 7884 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PSCM or VXUS?
PSCM has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $24 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PSCM or VXUS?
Over the past year PSCM returned +38.90% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so PSCM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), PSCM annualized +9.20% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PSCM or VXUS?
PSCM has been the more volatile fund at 24.4% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: PSCM -52.5% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both PSCM and VXUS?
PSCM and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PSCM and VXUS?
PSCM and VXUS share 2 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7884 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PSCM or VXUS?
PSCM yields 0.97% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.