PSCM vs VTI
Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. PSCM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PSCM | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $21M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.97% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 27 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +21.70% | +13.87% | |
| 1Y Return | +39.60% | +23.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.27% | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.36% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -52.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 7, 2010 | May 24, 2001 |
PSCM vs VTI Performance
Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF (PSCM) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PSCM returned +39.60% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, PSCM is up 21.70% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.
Over three years, PSCM compounded at +16.27% per year against +21.17% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +10.36% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, PSCM has the edge at +9.22% annualized vs +8.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PSCM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.5% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -52.5% for PSCM and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PSCM charges 0.29% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $3 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSCM currently yields 0.97% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
PSCM and VTI share 21 holdings out of 2787 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PSCM or VTI?
PSCM has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PSCM or VTI?
Over the past year PSCM returned +39.60% vs +23.31% for VTI, so PSCM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), PSCM annualized +9.22% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PSCM or VTI?
PSCM has been the more volatile fund at 24.5% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: PSCM -52.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both PSCM and VTI?
PSCM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PSCM and VTI?
PSCM and VTI share 21 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2787 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PSCM or VTI?
PSCM yields 0.97% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.