PSFF vs SPY
Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Which is better, PSFF or SPY?
All Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. SPY is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 92.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PSFF | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.66% | 0.09%Best |
| AUM | $603M | $804.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.98% |
| Holdings | 14 | 505 |
| YTD Return | +8.34% | +12.09%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.34% | +16.29%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.61% | +21.20%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.80% | +13.37%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.2%Best | 15.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -10.8%Best | -24.5% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,959 | $18,728Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 92.3% | 37.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | State Street Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | All Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 29, 2020 | Jan 22, 1993 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 30, 2020 to Sep 18, 2026 (5.7 years).
PSFF vs SPY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.7 years both funds cover.
PSFF vs SPY Performance
Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year PSFF returned +11.34% while SPY returned +16.29%. Year to date, PSFF is up 8.34% versus a gain of 12.09% for SPY.
Over three years, PSFF compounded at +12.61% per year against +21.20% for SPY; over five years the annualized figures are +9.80% and +13.37% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, SPY has the edge at +14.84% annualized vs +10.02%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SPY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 7.2% for PSFF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.8% for PSFF and -24.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PSFF charges 0.66% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $66 vs $9 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSFF currently yields 0.00% against 0.98% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 13 holdings in PSFF and 504 in SPY, totalling 100.0% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 13 positions we hold weights for in PSFF and 504 in SPY, against full books of 14 and 505.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 13 and 504 positions we hold weights for.
SPY holds 497 positions PSFF does not, 99.3% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 8.01%, AAPL 7.26%, MSFT 5.66%, AMZN 3.79%, GOOGL 2.99%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PSFF and SPY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PSFF or SPY?
PSFF has an expense ratio of 0.66% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PSFF or SPY?
Over the past year PSFF returned +11.34% vs +16.29% for SPY, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), PSFF annualized +10.02% vs +14.84% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PSFF or SPY?
SPY has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 7.2% for PSFF. Worst drawdown: PSFF -10.8% vs SPY -24.5%.
Should I hold both PSFF and SPY?
PSFF and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, PSFF or SPY?
PSFF yields 0.00% while SPY yields 0.98%, so SPY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SPY better than PSFF?
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. SPY is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 92.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.