PSFF vs VOO
PSFF vs VOO
Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PSFF | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.66% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $588M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 14 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +7.82% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +12.01% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.36% | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.49% | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.3% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -10.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 29, 2020 | Sep 7, 2010 |
PSFF vs VOO Performance
Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PSFF returned +12.01% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, PSFF is up 7.82% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Over three years, PSFF compounded at +12.36% per year against +21.50% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +9.49% and +13.44% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.58% annualized vs +10.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 7.3% for PSFF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.8% for PSFF and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PSFF charges 0.66% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $66 vs $3 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSFF currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
PSFF and VOO share 0 holdings out of 518 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PSFF or VOO?
PSFF has an expense ratio of 0.66% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $63 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PSFF or VOO?
Over the past year PSFF returned +12.01% vs +23.71% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), PSFF annualized +10.14% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PSFF or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 7.3% for PSFF. Worst drawdown: PSFF -10.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both PSFF and VOO?
PSFF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between PSFF and VOO?
PSFF and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 518 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PSFF or VOO?
PSFF yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.