PSMD vs SCHD
PSMD vs SCHD
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (January) ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PSMD | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $93M | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +7.55% | +24.26% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.30% | +31.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.35% | +15.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.37% | +9.72% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.5% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -12.0% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 22, 2020 | Oct 20, 2011 |
PSMD vs SCHD Performance
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (January) ETF (PSMD) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year PSMD returned +13.30% while SCHD returned +31.38%. Year to date, PSMD is up 7.55% versus a gain of 24.26% for SCHD.
Over three years, PSMD compounded at +12.35% per year against +15.08% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +9.37% and +9.72% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.39% annualized vs +9.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.6% compared with 7.5% for PSMD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.0% for PSMD and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PSMD charges 0.49% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $6 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSMD currently yields 0.00% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
PSMD and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 101 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PSMD or SCHD?
PSMD has an expense ratio of 0.49% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $43 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PSMD or SCHD?
Over the past year PSMD returned +13.30% vs +31.38% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), PSMD annualized +9.94% vs +11.39% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PSMD or SCHD?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 13.6% annualized versus 7.5% for PSMD. Worst drawdown: PSMD -12.0% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both PSMD and SCHD?
PSMD and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PSMD and SCHD?
PSMD and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 101 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PSMD or SCHD?
PSMD yields 0.00% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.