PWER vs VXUS
Nomura Energy Transition ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. PWER delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PWER | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.80% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $12M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.82% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 36 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +27.24% | +14.19% | |
| 1Y Return | +57.45% | +27.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.03% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -30.0% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Nomura Asset Management Co Ltd | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 28, 2023 | Jan 26, 2011 |
PWER vs VXUS Performance
Nomura Energy Transition ETF (PWER) is a ETF from Nomura Asset Management Co Ltd and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PWER returned +57.45% while VXUS returned +27.38%. Year to date, PWER is up 27.24% versus a gain of 14.19% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PWER has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.5% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.0% for PWER and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PWER charges 0.80% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $5 annually, a gap of $75 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PWER currently yields 0.82% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
PWER and VXUS share 10 holdings out of 7883 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PWER or VXUS?
PWER has an expense ratio of 0.80% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $75 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PWER or VXUS?
Over the past year PWER returned +57.45% vs +27.38% for VXUS, so PWER leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), PWER annualized +25.57% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PWER or VXUS?
PWER has been the more volatile fund at 20.5% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: PWER -30.0% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both PWER and VXUS?
PWER and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PWER and VXUS?
PWER and VXUS share 10 common holdings with a 1.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7883 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PWER or VXUS?
PWER yields 0.82% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.