QBF vs VXUS
QBF vs VXUS
Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QBF | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $12M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.01% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -27.91% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | -43.73% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -49.4% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 6, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
QBF vs VXUS Performance
Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly (QBF) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QBF returned -43.73% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, QBF is down 27.91% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QBF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.1% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -49.4% for QBF and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.16. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QBF charges 0.79% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $5 annually, a gap of $74 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QBF currently yields 2.01% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QBF or VXUS?
QBF has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $74 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QBF or VXUS?
Over the past year QBF returned -43.73% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QBF annualized -27.39% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QBF or VXUS?
QBF has been the more volatile fund at 28.1% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: QBF -49.4% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both QBF and VXUS?
QBF and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.16, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, QBF or VXUS?
QBF yields 2.01% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.