QBQF vs VTI
AllianzIM Growth-100 Buffer15 ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QBQF | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.74% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $9M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +4.05% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -2.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | AllianzIM | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 31, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
QBQF vs VTI Performance
AllianzIM Growth-100 Buffer15 ETF (QBQF) is a ETF from AllianzIM and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, QBQF is up 4.05% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -2.4% for QBQF and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QBQF charges 0.74% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $74 vs $3 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QBQF currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QBQF or VTI?
QBQF has an expense ratio of 0.74% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $71 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, QBQF or VTI?
QBQF yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.