QBQF vs VOO
AllianzIM Growth-100 Buffer15 ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QBQF | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.74% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $9M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +3.23% | +12.25% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +20.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -2.4% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | AllianzIM | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 31, 2026 | Sep 7, 2010 |
QBQF vs VOO Performance
AllianzIM Growth-100 Buffer15 ETF (QBQF) is a ETF from AllianzIM and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, QBQF is up 3.23% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -2.4% for QBQF and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QBQF charges 0.74% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $74 vs $3 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QBQF currently yields 0.00% against 1.08% for VOO.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QBQF or VOO?
QBQF has an expense ratio of 0.74% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $71 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, QBQF or VOO?
QBQF yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.