QBQF vs VXUS
AllianzIM Growth-100 Buffer15 ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QBQF | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.74% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $8M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +3.69% | +14.07% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +27.24% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.14% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -2.4% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | AllianzIM | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 31, 2026 | Jan 26, 2011 |
QBQF vs VXUS Performance
AllianzIM Growth-100 Buffer15 ETF (QBQF) is a ETF from AllianzIM and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, QBQF is up 3.69% versus a gain of 14.07% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -2.4% for QBQF and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QBQF charges 0.74% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $74 vs $5 annually, a gap of $69 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QBQF currently yields 0.00% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QBQF or VXUS?
QBQF has an expense ratio of 0.74% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $69 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, QBQF or VXUS?
QBQF yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.