QCJL vs VOO
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - July vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QCJL | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.90% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $97M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +7.98% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +12.58% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.4% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -11.2% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 19, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
QCJL vs VOO Performance
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - July (QCJL) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QCJL returned +12.58% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, QCJL is up 7.98% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 6.4% for QCJL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.2% for QCJL and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QCJL charges 0.90% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $90 vs $3 annually, a gap of $87 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QCJL currently yields 0.00% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
QCJL and VOO share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QCJL or VOO?
QCJL has an expense ratio of 0.90% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $87 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QCJL or VOO?
Over the past year QCJL returned +12.58% vs +21.87% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QCJL annualized +12.17% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QCJL or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 6.4% for QCJL. Worst drawdown: QCJL -11.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both QCJL and VOO?
QCJL and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between QCJL and VOO?
QCJL and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QCJL or VOO?
QCJL yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.