QCMD vs VTI
Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QCMD | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.12% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 8 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -14.18% | +13.86% | |
| 1Y Return | -23.02% | +20.74% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.66% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.90% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 61.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 25, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
QCMD vs VTI Performance
Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X ETF (QCMD) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QCMD returned -23.02% while VTI returned +20.74%. Year to date, QCMD is down 14.18% versus a gain of 13.86% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QCMD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 61.7% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.0% for QCMD and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.76. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QCMD charges 1.00% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $3 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QCMD currently yields 3.12% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
QCMD and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2791 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QCMD or VTI?
QCMD has an expense ratio of 1.00% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $97 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QCMD or VTI?
Over the past year QCMD returned -23.02% vs +20.74% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), QCMD annualized -21.77% vs +8.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QCMD or VTI?
QCMD has been the more volatile fund at 61.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: QCMD -56.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both QCMD and VTI?
QCMD and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QCMD and VTI?
QCMD and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2791 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QCMD or VTI?
QCMD yields 3.12% while VTI yields 1.07%, so QCMD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.