QEMM vs QQQ
State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QEMM delivered stronger 1-year returns. QEMM offers more diversification with 855 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QEMM | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $61M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.52% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 855 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +22.32% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +33.34% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.06% | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.57% | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.5% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -40.5% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | SPDR State Street Global Advisors | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 4, 2014 | Mar 10, 1999 |
QEMM vs QQQ Performance
State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM) is a ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year QEMM returned +33.34% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, QEMM is up 22.32% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Over three years, QEMM compounded at +20.06% per year against +25.96% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +8.57% and +14.54% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +4.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 14.5% for QEMM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -40.5% for QEMM and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QEMM charges 0.30% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $18 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QEMM currently yields 4.52% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
QEMM and QQQ share 1 holdings out of 907 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QEMM | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PDD:IE | 0.84% | 0.27% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QEMM or QQQ?
QEMM has an expense ratio of 0.30% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $12 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QEMM or QQQ?
Over the past year QEMM returned +33.34% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QEMM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), QEMM annualized +4.38% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QEMM or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 14.5% for QEMM. Worst drawdown: QEMM -40.5% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both QEMM and QQQ?
QEMM and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QEMM and QQQ?
QEMM and QQQ share 1 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 907 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QEMM or QQQ?
QEMM yields 4.52% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QEMM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.