QEMM vs VTI
State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, QEMM or VTI?
Each has led over a different period.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. QEMM led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QEMM | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $54M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.64% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 845 | 3,542 |
| YTD Return | +15.45%Best | +12.23% |
| 1Y Return | +16.75%Best | +12.74% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.43% | +21.44%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.72% | +10.83%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.5%Best | 15.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -40.5% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,843 | $16,722Best |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 4, 2014 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 5, 2014 to Nov 11, 2026 (12.4 years).
QEMM vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 12.4 years both funds cover.
QEMM vs VTI Performance
State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QEMM returned +16.75% while VTI returned +12.74%. Year to date, QEMM is up 15.45% versus a gain of 12.23% for VTI.
Over three years, QEMM compounded at +17.43% per year against +21.44% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +6.72% and +10.83% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +11.84% annualized vs +3.82%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.5% for QEMM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -40.5% for QEMM and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QEMM charges 0.30% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $3 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QEMM currently yields 4.64% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 798 holdings in QEMM and 3,464 in VTI, totalling 92.8% and 97.2% of the two funds. That is not enough of QEMM to divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 2 positions appear in both.
2 positions in common, counted across the 798 positions we hold weights for in QEMM and 3,464 in VTI, against full books of 845 and 3,542.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QEMM and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QEMM or VTI?
QEMM has an expense ratio of 0.30% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QEMM or VTI?
Over the past year QEMM returned +16.75% vs +12.74% for VTI, so QEMM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), QEMM annualized +3.82% vs +11.84% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QEMM or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.5% for QEMM. Worst drawdown: QEMM -40.5% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both QEMM and VTI?
QEMM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, QEMM or VTI?
QEMM yields 4.64% while VTI yields 1.06%, so QEMM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than QEMM?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. QEMM led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.