QEMM vs VTI
State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. QEMM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QEMM | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $61M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.52% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 855 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +22.32% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +33.34% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.06% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.57% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -40.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | SPDR State Street Global Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 4, 2014 | May 24, 2001 |
QEMM vs VTI Performance
State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM) is a ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QEMM returned +33.34% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, QEMM is up 22.32% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, QEMM compounded at +20.06% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +8.57% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs +4.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 14.5% for QEMM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -40.5% for QEMM and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QEMM charges 0.30% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $3 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QEMM currently yields 4.52% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
QEMM and VTI share 1 holdings out of 3592 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QEMM | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| EAST:EG | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QEMM or VTI?
QEMM has an expense ratio of 0.30% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $27 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QEMM or VTI?
Over the past year QEMM returned +33.34% vs +22.35% for VTI, so QEMM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), QEMM annualized +4.38% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QEMM or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 14.5% for QEMM. Worst drawdown: QEMM -40.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both QEMM and VTI?
QEMM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QEMM and VTI?
QEMM and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3592 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QEMM or VTI?
QEMM yields 4.52% while VTI yields 1.07%, so QEMM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.