QEMM vs VOO
State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. QEMM delivered stronger 1-year returns. QEMM offers more diversification with 855 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QEMM | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $61M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.52% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 855 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +22.32% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +33.34% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.06% | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.57% | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.5% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -40.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | SPDR State Street Global Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 4, 2014 | Sep 7, 2010 |
QEMM vs VOO Performance
State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM) is a ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QEMM returned +33.34% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, QEMM is up 22.32% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Over three years, QEMM compounded at +20.06% per year against +22.06% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +8.57% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.47% annualized vs +4.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QEMM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.5% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -40.5% for QEMM and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QEMM charges 0.30% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $3 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QEMM currently yields 4.52% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
QEMM and VOO share 0 holdings out of 1311 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QEMM or VOO?
QEMM has an expense ratio of 0.30% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $27 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QEMM or VOO?
Over the past year QEMM returned +33.34% vs +21.87% for VOO, so QEMM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), QEMM annualized +4.38% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QEMM or VOO?
QEMM has been the more volatile fund at 14.5% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: QEMM -40.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both QEMM and VOO?
QEMM and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QEMM and VOO?
QEMM and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1311 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QEMM or VOO?
QEMM yields 4.52% while VOO yields 1.08%, so QEMM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.