QLTI vs VTI
GMO International Quality ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QLTI | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $298M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.60% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 38 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +4.68% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +10.99% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | GMO | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 28, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
QLTI vs VTI Performance
GMO International Quality ETF (QLTI) is a ETF from GMO and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QLTI returned +10.99% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, QLTI is up 4.68% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 13.2% for QLTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.8% for QLTI and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.50. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QLTI charges 0.60% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QLTI currently yields 0.60% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
QLTI and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2823 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QLTI or VTI?
QLTI has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QLTI or VTI?
Over the past year QLTI returned +10.99% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QLTI annualized +7.07% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QLTI or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 13.2% for QLTI. Worst drawdown: QLTI -14.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both QLTI and VTI?
QLTI and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.50, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QLTI and VTI?
QLTI and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2823 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QLTI or VTI?
QLTI yields 0.60% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.