QLTI vs VOO
GMO International Quality ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QLTI | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $298M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.60% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 38 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +3.74% | +12.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.40% | +20.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.1% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | GMO | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 28, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
QLTI vs VOO Performance
GMO International Quality ETF (QLTI) is a ETF from GMO and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QLTI returned +9.40% while VOO returned +20.92%. Year to date, QLTI is up 3.74% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 13.1% for QLTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.8% for QLTI and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.50. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QLTI charges 0.60% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QLTI currently yields 0.60% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
QLTI and VOO share 0 holdings out of 541 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QLTI or VOO?
QLTI has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QLTI or VOO?
Over the past year QLTI returned +9.40% vs +20.92% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QLTI annualized +6.55% vs +13.45% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QLTI or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 13.1% for QLTI. Worst drawdown: QLTI -14.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both QLTI and VOO?
QLTI and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.50, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QLTI and VOO?
QLTI and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 541 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QLTI or VOO?
QLTI yields 0.60% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.