QQQ vs REKT
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Direxion Daily Crypto Industry Bear 1X ETF
Which is better, QQQ or REKT?
Opposite sides of the same exposure.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.69, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | REKT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.51% |
| AUM | $483.5B | $2M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 3.99% |
| Holdings | 107 | 5 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.9%Best | 35.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -22.8%Best | -54.9% |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $12,748Best | $7,384 |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Direxion Shares ETF Trust |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Trading-Leveraged Equity |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jul 17, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 154 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. QQQ has data through Sep 11, 2026 and REKT through Apr 10, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 17, 2024 to Apr 10, 2026 (1.7 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
REKT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 35.3% compared with 13.9% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.8% for QQQ and -54.9% for REKT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.69. They move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, while paying both funds' fees.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while REKT charges 0.51%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $51 annually, a gap of $33 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 3.99% for REKT.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 102 holdings in QQQ and 3 in REKT, totalling 99.9% and 97.8% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 187 days apart, QQQ as of Aug 5, 2026 and REKT as of Jan 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 3 in REKT, against full books of 107 and 5.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and REKT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or REKT?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while REKT charges 0.51%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $33 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, QQQ or REKT?
REKT has been the more volatile fund at 35.3% annualized versus 13.9% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -22.8% vs REKT -54.9%.
Should I hold both QQQ and REKT?
QQQ and REKT have a monthly-return correlation of -0.69, so they move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, and pays both funds' fees on the way. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or REKT?
QQQ yields 0.44% while REKT yields 3.99%, so REKT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is REKT better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.69, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.