QQQ vs RHRX
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs RH Tactical Rotation ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. RHRX delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | RHRX | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 1.38% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $41M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 8 | |
| YTD Return | +15.47% | +17.53% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.44% | +25.14% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.47% | +20.60% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.22% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 15.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -25.3% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Adaptive ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Sep 20, 2012 |
QQQ vs RHRX Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX) is a ETF from Adaptive ETFs. Over the past year QQQ returned +24.44% while RHRX returned +25.14%. Year to date, QQQ is up 15.47% versus a gain of 17.53% for RHRX.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.47% per year against +20.60% for RHRX. Across the full 5-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +12.99% annualized vs +8.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 15.9% for RHRX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -25.3% for RHRX. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RHRX charges 1.38%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $138 annually, a gap of $120 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.00% for RHRX.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and RHRX share 0 holdings out of 107 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or RHRX?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RHRX charges 1.38%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $120 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or RHRX?
Over the past year QQQ returned +24.44% vs +25.14% for RHRX, so RHRX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), QQQ annualized +12.99% vs +8.73% for RHRX. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or RHRX?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 15.9% for RHRX. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs RHRX -25.3%.
Should I hold both QQQ and RHRX?
QQQ and RHRX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and RHRX?
QQQ and RHRX share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 107 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RHRX?
QQQ yields 0.44% while RHRX yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.