QQQ vs RKNG
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Defiance Retail Kings ETF
Which is better, QQQ or RKNG?
Large Cap Growth against Multi Alternative.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. RKNG is less concentrated, with 43.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | RKNG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.79% |
| AUM | $498.6B | $6M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.42% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 321 | 64 |
| YTD Return | +22.95%Best | -1.89% |
| 1Y Return | +23.60% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.53% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +16.67% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 47.2% | 43.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Defiance ETFs, LLC |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jan 21, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
QQQ vs RKNG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QQQ vs RKNG Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Defiance Retail Kings ETF (RKNG) is an ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC. Year to date, QQQ is up 22.95% versus a loss of 1.89% for RKNG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RKNG charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $79 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.42% against 0.00% for RKNG.
Holdings Overlap
16.2% of QQQ's money is in holdings RKNG also owns. 28.3% of RKNG's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.
RKNG and QQQ share little of their money.
8 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 31 in RKNG, against full books of 321 and 64.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 18 positions for RKNG that do not appear in our book for QQQ (56.1% of the fund), and 88 for QQQ that do not appear in RKNG (81.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQ | Weight in RKNG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.85% | 3.98% | 0.87% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 3.71% | 4.08% | 0.37% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.15% | 4.08% | 0.93% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 2.28% | 3.30% | 1.02% |
| SNDKSandisk Corp/De | 1.07% | 3.35% | 2.28% |
| LITELumentum Holdings Inc | 0.32% | 3.75% | 3.43% |
| WDCWestern Digital Corp. | 0.68% | 3.22% | 2.54% |
| RKLBRocket Lab Corp | 0.16% | 2.58% | 2.42% |
28.3% of RKNG is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or RKNG?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RKNG charges 0.79%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $61 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and RKNG?
28.3% of RKNG's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 28.3% of RKNG's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 31 in RKNG.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RKNG?
QQQ yields 0.42% while RKNG yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RKNG better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. RKNG is less concentrated, with 43.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.