QQQ vs RNWZ
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | RNWZ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.75% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $6M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 1.24% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 24 | |
| YTD Return | +16.64% | +15.60% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.27% | +7.55% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.96% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.54% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 19.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -24.9% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | TrueShares | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Dec 8, 2022 |
QQQ vs RNWZ Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF (RNWZ) is a ETF from TrueShares. Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% while RNWZ returned +7.55%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.64% versus a gain of 15.60% for RNWZ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 19.9% for RNWZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -24.9% for RNWZ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.25. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RNWZ charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $75 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 1.24% for RNWZ.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and RNWZ share 1 holdings out of 125 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQ | Weight in RNWZ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AEP | 0.30% | 9.72% | 9.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or RNWZ?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RNWZ charges 0.75%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or RNWZ?
Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% vs +7.55% for RNWZ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), QQQ annualized +13.03% vs +1.43% for RNWZ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or RNWZ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 19.9% for RNWZ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs RNWZ -24.9%.
Should I hold both QQQ and RNWZ?
QQQ and RNWZ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.25, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and RNWZ?
QQQ and RNWZ share 1 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 125 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RNWZ?
QQQ yields 0.44% while RNWZ yields 1.24%, so RNWZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.