RNWZ vs VXUS
TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RNWZ | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $6M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.24% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 24 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +15.60% | +14.26% | |
| 1Y Return | +7.55% | +25.40% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.76% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -24.9% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | TrueShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 8, 2022 | Jan 26, 2011 |
RNWZ vs VXUS Performance
TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF (RNWZ) is a ETF from TrueShares and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RNWZ returned +7.55% while VXUS returned +25.40%. Year to date, RNWZ is up 15.60% versus a gain of 14.26% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RNWZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.9% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.9% for RNWZ and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RNWZ charges 0.75% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $5 annually, a gap of $70 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RNWZ currently yields 1.24% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
RNWZ and VXUS share 10 holdings out of 7883 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RNWZ or VXUS?
RNWZ has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $70 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RNWZ or VXUS?
Over the past year RNWZ returned +7.55% vs +25.40% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), RNWZ annualized +1.43% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RNWZ or VXUS?
RNWZ has been the more volatile fund at 19.9% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: RNWZ -24.9% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both RNWZ and VXUS?
RNWZ and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RNWZ and VXUS?
RNWZ and VXUS share 10 common holdings with a 0.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7883 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RNWZ or VXUS?
RNWZ yields 1.24% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.