QQQ vs RSBY
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | RSBY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 1.01% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $55M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 1.78% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 35 | |
| YTD Return | +16.64% | +17.41% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.27% | +12.88% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.96% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.54% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 13.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -23.4% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Return Stacked ETF | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Aug 20, 2024 |
QQQ vs RSBY Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) is a ETF from Return Stacked ETF. Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% while RSBY returned +12.88%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.64% versus a gain of 17.41% for RSBY.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 13.8% for RSBY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -23.4% for RSBY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.06. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RSBY charges 1.01%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $101 annually, a gap of $83 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 1.78% for RSBY.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and RSBY share 0 holdings out of 104 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or RSBY?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RSBY charges 1.01%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $83 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or RSBY?
Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% vs +12.88% for RSBY, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QQQ annualized +13.03% vs -4.25% for RSBY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or RSBY?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 13.8% for RSBY. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs RSBY -23.4%.
Should I hold both QQQ and RSBY?
QQQ and RSBY have a monthly-return correlation of -0.06, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and RSBY?
QQQ and RSBY share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 104 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RSBY?
QQQ yields 0.44% while RSBY yields 1.78%, so RSBY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.