QQQ vs RSEE
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Rareview Systematic Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | RSEE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 2.71% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $75M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 7 | |
| YTD Return | +15.47% | +13.69% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.44% | +23.75% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.47% | +18.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.22% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -21.7% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Rareview Capital | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jan 20, 2022 |
QQQ vs RSEE Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Rareview Systematic Equity ETF (RSEE) is a ETF from Rareview Capital. Over the past year QQQ returned +24.44% while RSEE returned +23.75%. Year to date, QQQ is up 15.47% versus a gain of 13.69% for RSEE.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.47% per year against +18.81% for RSEE. Across the full 5-year window we track, RSEE has the edge at +13.17% annualized vs +12.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 15.4% for RSEE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -21.7% for RSEE. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RSEE charges 2.71%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $271 annually, a gap of $253 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.00% for RSEE.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and RSEE share 0 holdings out of 108 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or RSEE?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RSEE charges 2.71%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $253 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or RSEE?
Over the past year QQQ returned +24.44% vs +23.75% for RSEE, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), QQQ annualized +12.99% vs +13.17% for RSEE. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or RSEE?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 15.4% for RSEE. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs RSEE -21.7%.
Should I hold both QQQ and RSEE?
QQQ and RSEE have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and RSEE?
QQQ and RSEE share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 108 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RSEE?
QQQ yields 0.44% while RSEE yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.