QQQ vs RWEM
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Which is better, QQQ or RWEM?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. RWEM led over 1Y. RWEM is less concentrated, with 34.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | RWEM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.52% |
| AUM | $483.5B | $74M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 1.76% |
| Holdings | 107 | 244 |
| YTD Return | +17.21% | +20.74%Best |
| 1Y Return | +22.10% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.27% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.60% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.5% | 34.0%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | The Advisors Inner Circle Fund |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Dec 15, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
QQQ vs RWEM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QQQ vs RWEM Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (RWEM) is an ETF from The Advisors Inner Circle Fund. Year to date, QQQ is up 17.21% versus a gain of 20.74% for RWEM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RWEM charges 0.52%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $52 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 1.76% for RWEM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 102 holdings in QQQ and 222 in RWEM, totalling 99.9% and 98.6% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 222 in RWEM, against full books of 107 and 244.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 3 positions for RWEM that do not appear in our book for QQQ (0.6% of the fund), and 96 for QQQ that do not appear in RWEM (97.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and RWEM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or RWEM?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RWEM charges 0.52%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $34 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RWEM?
QQQ yields 0.44% while RWEM yields 1.76%, so RWEM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RWEM better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. RWEM led over 1Y. RWEM is less concentrated, with 34.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.