RWEM vs VYM
Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, RWEM or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. RWEM led over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RWEM | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.52% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $73M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.83% | 2.24% |
| Holdings | 244 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +25.08%Best | +14.82% |
| 1Y Return | - | +20.84% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.64% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.28% |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.7% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | The Advisors Inner Circle Fund | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 15, 2021 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
RWEM vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
RWEM vs VYM Performance
Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (RWEM) is an ETF from The Advisors Inner Circle Fund and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, RWEM is up 25.08% versus a gain of 14.82% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RWEM charges 0.52% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $52 vs $4 annually, a gap of $48 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RWEM currently yields 1.83% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
0.5% of RWEM's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.1% of VYM's money is in holdings RWEM also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
The two holdings books were reported 50 days apart, RWEM as of Aug 19, 2026 and VYM as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
2 positions in common, counted across the 222 positions we hold weights for in RWEM and 603 in VYM, against full books of 244 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 569 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for RWEM (97.3% of the fund), and 1 for RWEM that do not appear in VYM (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of RWEM and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RWEM or VYM?
RWEM has an expense ratio of 0.52% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $48 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, RWEM or VYM?
RWEM yields 1.83% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than RWEM?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. RWEM led over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.