QQQ vs SMRZ
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Global X Small Modular Reactor ETF
Which is better, QQQ or SMRZ?
Large Cap Growth against Small Cap Blend.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 98.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | SMRZ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $437.3B | - |
| Dividend Yield | 0.43% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 208 | 11 |
| YTD Return | +12.62%Best | -16.09% |
| 1Y Return | +11.32% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.90% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.43% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.9%Best | 98.0% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Small Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Oct 14, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
QQQ vs SMRZ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QQQ vs SMRZ Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Global X Small Modular Reactor ETF (SMRZ) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Year to date, QQQ is up 12.62% versus a loss of 16.09% for SMRZ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SMRZ charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $75 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.43% against 0.00% for SMRZ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 101 holdings in QQQ and 11 in SMRZ, totalling 99.7% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 11 in SMRZ, against full books of 208 and 11.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 10 positions for SMRZ that do not appear in our book for QQQ (97.0% of the fund), and 94 for QQQ that do not appear in SMRZ (97.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and SMRZ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SMRZ?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SMRZ charges 0.75%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SMRZ?
QQQ yields 0.43% while SMRZ yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SMRZ better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 98.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.