QQQ vs SPIB
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs State Street SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF
Quick Verdict
SPIB has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPIB offers more diversification with 1090 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | SPIB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $455.8B | $11.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.41% | 4.44% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 5,091 | |
| YTD Return | +19.68% | +0.33% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.75% | +2.55% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.25% | +5.87% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.39% | +1.61% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 4.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -14.9% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Feb 10, 2009 |
QQQ vs SPIB Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and State Street SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPIB) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year QQQ returned +26.75% while SPIB returned +2.55%. Year to date, QQQ is up 19.68% versus a gain of 0.33% for SPIB.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +26.25% per year against +5.87% for SPIB; over five years the annualized figures are +15.39% and +1.61% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.15% annualized vs +1.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 4.1% for SPIB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -14.9% for SPIB. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SPIB charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $4 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.41% against 4.44% for SPIB.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and SPIB share 0 holdings out of 1193 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SPIB?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SPIB charges 0.04%. SPIB is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $14 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or SPIB?
Over the past year QQQ returned +26.75% vs +2.55% for SPIB, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), QQQ annualized +13.15% vs +1.54% for SPIB. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or SPIB?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 4.1% for SPIB. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs SPIB -14.9%.
Should I hold both QQQ and SPIB?
QQQ and SPIB have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and SPIB?
QQQ and SPIB share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1193 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SPIB?
QQQ yields 0.41% while SPIB yields 4.44%, so SPIB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.