QQQ vs TBFC
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | TBFC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.44% | |
| AUM | $455.8B | $357M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.41% | 2.99% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 28 | |
| YTD Return | +19.68% | +5.91% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.75% | +11.07% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.25% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.39% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 6.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -10.0% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Brinsmere Fund | |
| Category | Equity | Allocation/Balanced | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jan 12, 2024 |
QQQ vs TBFC Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF (TBFC) is a ETF from Brinsmere Fund. Over the past year QQQ returned +26.75% while TBFC returned +11.07%. Year to date, QQQ is up 19.68% versus a gain of 5.91% for TBFC.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 6.6% for TBFC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -10.0% for TBFC. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while TBFC charges 0.44%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $44 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.41% against 2.99% for TBFC.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and TBFC share 0 holdings out of 130 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or TBFC?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while TBFC charges 0.44%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or TBFC?
Over the past year QQQ returned +26.75% vs +11.07% for TBFC, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), QQQ annualized +13.15% vs +9.55% for TBFC. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or TBFC?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 6.6% for TBFC. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs TBFC -10.0%.
Should I hold both QQQ and TBFC?
QQQ and TBFC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and TBFC?
QQQ and TBFC share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 130 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or TBFC?
QQQ yields 0.41% while TBFC yields 2.99%, so TBFC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.