QQQ vs TRUR
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs VanEck Real Estate TruSector ETF
Which is better, QQQ or TRUR?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
TRUR has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 47.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 67.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | TRUR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.17%Best |
| AUM | $498.6B | $241,054 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.42% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 321 | 64 |
| YTD Return | +22.67%Best | -6.14% |
| 1Y Return | +24.33% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +29.05% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +17.00% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 47.2%Best | 67.0% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | VanEck |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jul 7, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
QQQ vs TRUR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QQQ vs TRUR Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and VanEck Real Estate TruSector ETF (TRUR) is an ETF from VanEck. Year to date, QQQ is up 22.67% versus a loss of 6.14% for TRUR.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while TRUR charges 0.17%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $17 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.42% against 0.00% for TRUR.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 102 holdings in QQQ and 31 in TRUR, totalling 99.9% and 99.7% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 31 in TRUR, against full books of 321 and 64.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 31 positions for TRUR that do not appear in our book for QQQ (99.7% of the fund), and 96 for QQQ that do not appear in TRUR (97.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and TRUR you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or TRUR?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while TRUR charges 0.17%. TRUR is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or TRUR?
QQQ yields 0.42% while TRUR yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TRUR better than QQQ?
TRUR has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 47.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 67.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.