SCHD vs TRUR
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF vs VanEck Real Estate TruSector ETF
Which is better, SCHD or TRUR?
SCHD costs less.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 66.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHD | TRUR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06%Best | 0.17% |
| AUM | $112.2B | $259,152.43 |
| Dividend Yield | 3.13% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 103 | 33 |
| YTD Return | +28.59%Best | +0.40% |
| 1Y Return | +31.77% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.70% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.09% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.5%Best | 66.1% |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | VanEck |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 20, 2011 | Jul 7, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
SCHD vs TRUR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
SCHD vs TRUR Performance
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and VanEck Real Estate TruSector ETF (TRUR) is an ETF from VanEck. Year to date, SCHD is up 28.59% versus a gain of 0.40% for TRUR.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCHD charges 0.06% per year while TRUR charges 0.17%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $17 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 3.13% against 0.00% for TRUR.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 100 holdings in SCHD and 32 in TRUR, totalling 100.0% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in SCHD and 32 in TRUR, against full books of 103 and 33.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 100 and 32 positions we hold weights for.
SCHD holds 99 positions TRUR does not, 99.9% of the fund.
Largest: ABT 4.70%, AMGN 4.62%, HD 4.32%, MRK 4.26%, KO 4.20%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SCHD and TRUR you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCHD or TRUR?
SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while TRUR charges 0.17%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or TRUR?
SCHD yields 3.13% while TRUR yields 0.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TRUR better than SCHD?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 66.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.