QQQ vs UNHW
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF
Which is better, QQQ or UNHW?
Large Cap Growth against Option Writing.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | UNHW |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.99% |
| AUM | $437.3B | $5M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.43% | 32.16% |
| Holdings | 208 | 11 |
| YTD Return | +12.98%Best | -1.28% |
| 1Y Return | +11.59%Best | -2.32% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.05% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.74% | - |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Roundhill Investments |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Option Writing |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Dec 3, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
QQQ vs UNHW growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QQQ vs UNHW Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW) is an ETF from Roundhill Investments. Over the past year QQQ returned +11.59% while UNHW returned -2.32%. Year to date, QQQ is up 12.98% versus a loss of 1.28% for UNHW.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while UNHW charges 0.99%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $99 annually, a gap of $81 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.43% against 32.16% for UNHW.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 101 holdings in QQQ and 2 in UNHW, totalling 99.7% and 17.4% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 2 in UNHW, against full books of 208 and 11.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and UNHW you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or UNHW?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while UNHW charges 0.99%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $81 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or UNHW?
Over the past year QQQ returned +11.59% vs -2.32% for UNHW, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or UNHW?
QQQ yields 0.43% while UNHW yields 32.16%, so UNHW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is UNHW better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.