QQQ vs UXJA
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs FT Vest US Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January
Which is better, QQQ or UXJA?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | UXJA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.85% |
| AUM | $483.5B | $12M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 107 | 8 |
| YTD Return | +17.21%Best | +12.32% |
| 1Y Return | +22.10%Best | +16.73% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.27% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.60% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.1% | 14.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.8% | -20.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $13,886Best | $12,881 |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jan 17, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 21, 2025 to Sep 17, 2026 (1.7 years).
QQQ vs UXJA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.
QQQ vs UXJA Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and FT Vest US Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January (UXJA) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year QQQ returned +22.10% while UXJA returned +16.73%. Year to date, QQQ is up 17.21% versus a gain of 12.32% for UXJA.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.1% compared with 14.2% for UXJA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.8% for QQQ and -20.0% for UXJA. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while UXJA charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $85 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.00% for UXJA.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and UXJA you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or UXJA?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while UXJA charges 0.85%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or UXJA?
Over the past year QQQ returned +22.10% vs +16.73% for UXJA, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QQQ annualized +21.30% vs +16.06% for UXJA. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or UXJA?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 20.1% annualized versus 14.2% for UXJA. Worst drawdown: QQQ -22.8% vs UXJA -20.0%.
Should I hold both QQQ and UXJA?
QQQ and UXJA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or UXJA?
QQQ yields 0.44% while UXJA yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is UXJA better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.