QQQ vs WBIG
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF
Which is better, QQQ or WBIG?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. WBIG is less concentrated, with 19.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | WBIG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 1.59% |
| AUM | $483.5B | $33M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.94% |
| Holdings | 107 | 81 |
| YTD Return | +17.21%Best | +12.61% |
| 1Y Return | +22.10%Best | +16.55% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.27%Best | +6.82% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.60%Best | +1.88% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.5% | 11.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -35.1% | -25.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,766Best | $10,976 |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.5% | 19.4%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | WBI Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Aug 25, 2014 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 27, 2014 to Sep 17, 2026 (12.1 years).
QQQ vs WBIG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QQQ vs WBIG Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF (WBIG) is an ETF from WBI Investments. Over the past year QQQ returned +22.10% while WBIG returned +16.55%. Year to date, QQQ is up 17.21% versus a gain of 12.61% for WBIG.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.27% per year against +6.82% for WBIG; over five years the annualized figures are +14.60% and +1.88% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +18.11% annualized vs +1.27%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.5% compared with 11.3% for WBIG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.1% for QQQ and -25.3% for WBIG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while WBIG charges 1.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $159 annually, a gap of $141 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.94% for WBIG.
Holdings Overlap
2.9% of QQQ's money is in holdings WBIG also owns. 5.6% of WBIG's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.
WBIG and QQQ share little of their money.
6 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 78 in WBIG, against full books of 107 and 81.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 66 positions for WBIG that do not appear in our book for QQQ (83.0% of the fund), and 90 for QQQ that do not appear in WBIG (94.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and WBIG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or WBIG?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while WBIG charges 1.59%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $141 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or WBIG?
Over the past year QQQ returned +22.10% vs +16.55% for WBIG, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), QQQ annualized +18.11% vs +1.27% for WBIG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or WBIG?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 18.5% annualized versus 11.3% for WBIG. Worst drawdown: QQQ -35.1% vs WBIG -25.3%.
Should I hold both QQQ and WBIG?
QQQ and WBIG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and WBIG?
5.6% of WBIG's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 5.6% of WBIG's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 78 in WBIG.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or WBIG?
QQQ yields 0.44% while WBIG yields 0.94%, so WBIG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WBIG better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. WBIG is less concentrated, with 19.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.