QQQ vs WBIG
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | WBIG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 1.59% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $33M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 1.00% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 81 | |
| YTD Return | +16.64% | +15.66% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.27% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.96% | +8.05% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.54% | +2.16% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 11.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -25.3% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | WBI Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Aug 25, 2014 |
QQQ vs WBIG Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF (WBIG) is a ETF from WBI Investments. Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% while WBIG returned +22.35%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.64% versus a gain of 15.66% for WBIG.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.96% per year against +8.05% for WBIG; over five years the annualized figures are +14.54% and +2.16% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +1.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 11.3% for WBIG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -25.3% for WBIG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while WBIG charges 1.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $159 annually, a gap of $141 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 1.00% for WBIG.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and WBIG share 9 holdings out of 173 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or WBIG?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while WBIG charges 1.59%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $141 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or WBIG?
Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% vs +22.35% for WBIG, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), QQQ annualized +13.03% vs +1.51% for WBIG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or WBIG?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 11.3% for WBIG. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs WBIG -25.3%.
Should I hold both QQQ and WBIG?
QQQ and WBIG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and WBIG?
QQQ and WBIG share 9 common holdings with a 4.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 173 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or WBIG?
QQQ yields 0.44% while WBIG yields 1.00%, so WBIG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.