QQQ vs WWJD
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Inspire International ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. WWJD offers more diversification with 218 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | WWJD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.66% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $569M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 2.49% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 218 | |
| YTD Return | +16.64% | +14.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.27% | +21.25% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.96% | +18.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.54% | +8.78% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 18.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -35.8% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Inspire ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Sep 30, 2019 |
QQQ vs WWJD Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Inspire International ETF (WWJD) is a ETF from Inspire ETFs. Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% while WWJD returned +21.25%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.64% versus a gain of 14.20% for WWJD.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.96% per year against +18.54% for WWJD; over five years the annualized figures are +14.54% and +8.78% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +11.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 18.8% for WWJD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -35.8% for WWJD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while WWJD charges 0.66%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $66 annually, a gap of $48 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 2.49% for WWJD.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and WWJD share 2 holdings out of 299 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or WWJD?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while WWJD charges 0.66%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $48 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or WWJD?
Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% vs +21.25% for WWJD, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), QQQ annualized +13.03% vs +11.77% for WWJD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or WWJD?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 18.8% for WWJD. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs WWJD -35.8%.
Should I hold both QQQ and WWJD?
QQQ and WWJD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and WWJD?
QQQ and WWJD share 2 common holdings with a 0.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 299 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or WWJD?
QQQ yields 0.44% while WWJD yields 2.49%, so WWJD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.