VYM vs WWJD
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF vs Inspire International ETF
Which is better, VYM or WWJD?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, WWJD over 1Y. WWJD is less concentrated, with 6.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VYM | WWJD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.04%Best | 0.61% |
| AUM | $81.6B | $583M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.24% | 2.49% |
| Holdings | 613 | 202 |
| YTD Return | +14.82%Best | +13.73% |
| 1Y Return | +20.84% | +21.52%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.64%Best | +17.92% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.28%Best | +8.05% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.4%Best | 18.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.7%Best | -35.8% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,845Best | $14,727 |
| Top 10 Weight | 25.9% | 6.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Inspire ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 10, 2006 | Sep 30, 2019 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 1, 2019 to Sep 4, 2026 (6.9 years).
VYM vs WWJD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.9 years both funds cover.
VYM vs WWJD Performance
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Inspire International ETF (WWJD) is an ETF from Inspire ETFs. Over the past year VYM returned +20.84% while WWJD returned +21.52%. Year to date, VYM is up 14.82% versus a gain of 13.73% for WWJD.
Over three years, VYM compounded at +18.64% per year against +17.92% for WWJD; over five years the annualized figures are +12.28% and +8.05% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +12.06% annualized vs +11.64%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WWJD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.6% compared with 15.4% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.7% for VYM and -35.8% for WWJD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VYM charges 0.04% per year while WWJD charges 0.61%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $61 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VYM currently yields 2.24% against 2.49% for WWJD.
Holdings Overlap
0.5% of VYM's money is in holdings WWJD also owns. 1.0% of WWJD's money is in holdings VYM also owns.
WWJD and VYM share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 122 days apart, VYM as of Jun 30, 2026 and WWJD as of Feb 28, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
2 positions in common, counted across the 603 positions we hold weights for in VYM and 199 in WWJD, against full books of 613 and 202.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 0 positions for WWJD that do not appear in our book for VYM (0.0% of the fund), and 568 for VYM that do not appear in WWJD (97.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of VYM and WWJD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VYM or WWJD?
VYM has an expense ratio of 0.04% while WWJD charges 0.61%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, VYM or WWJD?
Over the past year VYM returned +20.84% vs +21.52% for WWJD, so WWJD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), VYM annualized +12.06% vs +11.64% for WWJD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, VYM or WWJD?
WWJD has been the more volatile fund at 18.6% annualized versus 15.4% for VYM. Worst drawdown: VYM -35.7% vs WWJD -35.8%.
Should I hold both VYM and WWJD?
VYM and WWJD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between VYM and WWJD?
1.0% of WWJD's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 1.0% of WWJD's is in holdings VYM also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 603 positions we hold weights for in VYM and 199 in WWJD.
Which pays a higher dividend, VYM or WWJD?
VYM yields 2.24% while WWJD yields 2.49%, so WWJD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WWJD better than VYM?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, WWJD over 1Y. WWJD is less concentrated, with 6.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.