QQQ vs XBTY
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF
Which is better, QQQ or XBTY?
Large Cap Growth against Option Writing.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | XBTY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 1.15% |
| AUM | $498.6B | $10M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.42% | 159.79% |
| Holdings | 321 | 18 |
| YTD Return | +22.95%Best | -19.07% |
| 1Y Return | +23.60%Best | -38.54% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.53% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +16.67% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.8%Best | 29.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -12.0%Best | -49.0% |
| $10,000 over 1.4 years | $14,644Best | $7,244 |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | GraniteShares |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Option Writing |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | May 12, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 13, 2025 to Oct 9, 2026 (1.4 years).
QQQ vs XBTY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.4 years both funds cover.
QQQ vs XBTY Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF (XBTY) is an ETF from GraniteShares. Over the past year QQQ returned +23.60% while XBTY returned -38.54%. Year to date, QQQ is up 22.95% versus a loss of 19.07% for XBTY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XBTY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.5% compared with 18.8% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.0% for QQQ and -49.0% for XBTY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.34. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while XBTY charges 1.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $115 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.42% against 159.79% for XBTY.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and XBTY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or XBTY?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while XBTY charges 1.15%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $97 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or XBTY?
Over the past year QQQ returned +23.60% vs -38.54% for XBTY, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), QQQ annualized +31.32% vs -20.57% for XBTY. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or XBTY?
XBTY has been the more volatile fund at 29.5% annualized versus 18.8% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -12.0% vs XBTY -49.0%.
Should I hold both QQQ and XBTY?
QQQ and XBTY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.34, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or XBTY?
QQQ yields 0.42% while XBTY yields 159.79%, so XBTY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XBTY better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.