QQQ vs XJUN
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs FT Vest US Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | XJUN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.85% | |
| AUM | $455.8B | $136M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.41% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 6 | |
| YTD Return | +17.46% | +4.95% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.02% | +8.49% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.51% | +10.30% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.12% | +8.58% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 5.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -9.1% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jul 12, 2021 |
QQQ vs XJUN Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and FT Vest US Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June (XJUN) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year QQQ returned +26.02% while XJUN returned +8.49%. Year to date, QQQ is up 17.46% versus a gain of 4.95% for XJUN.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.51% per year against +10.30% for XJUN; over five years the annualized figures are +15.12% and +8.58% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.08% annualized vs +8.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 5.8% for XJUN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -9.1% for XJUN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while XJUN charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $85 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.41% against 0.00% for XJUN.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and XJUN share 0 holdings out of 104 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or XJUN?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while XJUN charges 0.85%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $67 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or XJUN?
Over the past year QQQ returned +26.02% vs +8.49% for XJUN, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), QQQ annualized +13.08% vs +8.61% for XJUN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or XJUN?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 5.8% for XJUN. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs XJUN -9.1%.
Should I hold both QQQ and XJUN?
QQQ and XJUN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and XJUN?
QQQ and XJUN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 104 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or XJUN?
QQQ yields 0.41% while XJUN yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.